Search for: "State v. Mark A. Humphrey"
Results 21 - 40
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
So, with all of that background, we return to FEF v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with that conclusion based on the plain language of the licensing agreement and affirmed the lower court’s decision (Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:53 am
Case date: 20 April 2020 Case number: No. 18-56221 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am
Little time is wasted in stating that the acquisition of rights with no intention to use, and potentially to prevent third parties from using the mark in relation to these goods or services, will indeed constitute bad faith. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:30 pm
Humphrey is in Adobe .pdf format. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:14 am
Use in the court of trade As stated above, the most interesting point discussed by Sir Alastair Norris was whether the activities of Merck US constituted use in the UK in the course of trade. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am
In affirming a district court’s dismissal because use of the marks constituted nominative fair use, the appeals court concluded that Applied’s service was not readily identifiable without use of the trademarks, the seminar creators used only so much of the trademarks as was reasonably necessary, and use of the trademarks did not suggest sponsorship or endorsement (Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
At the Law Office of Mark Humphreys we can help. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
Ann Arbor, 675 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir. 2012) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:16 am
These principles were all recently explored again in the CJEU case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb v Lohmann & Rauscher International Case C-642/16. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:55 am
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:25 am
If you are in the Dallas Fort Worth area or out in Parker County and Weatherford, or anywhere else in the State for that matter you can contact Mark Humphreys. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm
Humphrey and that he is in fact qualified to be President of the United States with all of the powers that entails. [read post]
