Search for: "State v. Mark A. Humphrey"
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
The plaintiff Tea Board, a state agency established to promote cultivation and trade of tea, held registrations for ‘Darjeeling’ for tea as a geographical indication (“GI”) and a certification mark. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:07 am
That's gonna leave a mark. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
United States but before Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am
However, already in Boehringer Ingelheim v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Several decades later, Judge Mark H. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am
As part of an ACSblog symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Griswold v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
Second, in a 1935 Supreme Court case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Nearly a century after the Supreme Court decided Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
Argument preview: Determining the statute of limitations for military rape — and possibly a lot more
16 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
” When the Supreme Court entertains argument in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
Ameritech, 129 F.3d 857, 867 (6th Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Tyndall v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Art. 8(5) EUTMR, whereby the owner of a mark with a reputation can prevent the registration of a mark the use of which would take unfair advantage of the reputation, states that such use must be “without due cause”. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Law Articulated by Regulatory Agencies ― The Administrative Function --Administrative Procedure Act --Notes and Questions --Breger, Administrative Law After Forty Years --Notes and Questions --Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Matauszak, 415 Fed.Appx. 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (`[A] court cannot create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading’) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Payne v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992); Martin v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:14 am
The Law Firm of Mark Humphreys knows these laws and deals with them on a regular basis. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
These are all matters for member states’ national laws. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
EUIPO, long before the Levola decision, had already stated its “distaste” for scent marks, as clearly indicated in its Guidelines:” Article 3(9) EUTMIR clarifies that the filing of a sample or a specimen does not constitute a proper representation of a trade mark. [read post]
