Search for: "State v. Mark A. Stevens" Results 21 - 40 of 1,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nancy Marks, who was a close aide to Santos during his two congressional bids, is a longtime political operative and bookkeeper for multiple candidates. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN>  Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]