Search for: "State v. Mark R. Lowe"
Results 1 - 20
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 5:23 am
Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
It is Mr. 2 001.240 State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
R. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
Birss J was clear that it was open to him to refuse a reference if he considers that SkyKick's arguments are unfounded (see IATA v European Low Fares C-344/04 [2006] ECR 1403). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm
COMMON LAW TRADEMARK RIGHTS v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:50 am
Justice Mark C. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
Relying on such marks in opposition proceedings on the basis of mark-similarity is risky, as there is a low threshold for a competing sign to be considered dissimilar, i.e. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
In the present case, the goods were sweet, fast-food low priced products for everyday consumption targeted at the general public. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
One notable consequence of high state cigarette excise tax rates has been increased smuggling as people procure discounted packs from low-tax states and sell them in high-tax states. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Ekeland, Mark H. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:10 am
” Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:02 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court will resolve the issue in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
He evaluated the information and, in my judgment, was right to place a relatively low value on it in the light of the authorities to which I have referred. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:13 am
Sorenson v. [read post]
