Search for: "State v. Mark T."
Results 41 - 60
of 11,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
But Plaintiff did not, so the court closed this matter.Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
The confrontation between the two trade marks wasn't easy to avoid. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
If it can work as a title,can't a hashtag alsobe part of a trade mark? [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Specifically, the defendant argued that the qui tam provision didn't give the executive branch sufficient involvement in false marking litigation. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Mark McCloskey, Pardoned for Brandishing Guns at Protesters, Can't Get the Guns Back
26 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm
In Fay v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:42 am
Teal Bay Alliances, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
This provision requires applicants to state that the trade mark is being used, or that the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the trade mark. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
It doesn't make him any exception. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
See Quality Inns Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
Whether or not you intended to deceive the public by marking a product with an expired patent number requires you to prove you didn't. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 11:11 am
V. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) issued its eagerly awaited decision in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
