Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 21,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, Death Warrant Signed v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
Patent Compliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:28 am
Brunetti and the opinion of the AG Bobek in Constantin Film Produktion v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In truth, though, for slogan marks the public’s perception is not the same as for other types of marks and, therefore, assessing their distinctiveness results more difficult.In the light of Audi v OHIM the General Court addressed some typical issues affecting slogan marks. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:04 pm
At least one false marking plaintiff is following the lead of the most prolific false marking plaintiff, Thomas Simonian, by borrowing, word for word, the additional paragraph Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
On August 31, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:27 am
Pequignot v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:33 pm
John's Law Review Symposium: 40th Anniversary of Plyler v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
Another factor is the question of what would become of such property (including trade marks) once forfeited to the State. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:34 am
Haley, Judge Richard Mark Gergel held that South Carolina's same-sex marriage bans (by statute and state constitutional amendment) is... [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
at 810 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:23 pm
Such findings, as stated above, will be given deference by the courts. [read post]
