Search for: "State v. Markus" Results 81 - 100 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2010, 6:21 pm by Rumpole
State, 808 So. 2d 234, 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).SHOW DAVID MARKUS THE MONEY! [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:06 am
Call us strange, but we find the transcripts both informative and interesting reading.Speaking of the Supreme Court, the Court has granted cert in Cuellar v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:15 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Langevoort, Global Securities Regulation after the Financial CrisisChapter V Trade, Competition and Tax Related AspectsThomas Cottier & Markus Krajewski, What Role for Non-Discrimination and Prudential Standards in International Financial Law? [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:28 pm
 Well, to the extent that school desegregation has still proven to be difficult if not unworkable in many states and cities, there goes Brown v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
  Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am by Steve Hall
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
 None of the accusations are true, he states. [read post]