Search for: "State v. Markus"
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
Tracey sets up a particularly interesting dynamic in the Eleventh Circuit, which has a cell-site case pending en banc in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:11 pm
United Mexican States Cecily Rose, Circumstantial Evidence, Adverse Influences, and Findings of Corruption: Metal-Tech Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 10:23 am
According to the Illinois Appellate Court, a corporate condominium association that was dissolved is in a legal standing the same as that of a dead natural person such as found in the case of Markus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:26 pm
The High Court’s judgment in Schrems v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
Markus Jakobsson" [#252 filed January 31, 2014]; the "Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report and Exclude the Testimony of Dr. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
Markus Gampp (the attorney-at-law who also got the push email injunction lifted). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Markus Kotzur, European Union Law on Disaster Preparedness and ResponseGeneral Articles Rosanne van Alebeek, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:58 am
The AG quoted the 2010 case of Aleksey Ovchinikov v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
Kate Markus, for the EHRC as an intervener, argued that the Secretary of State had not complied with the public sector equality duty, and summarised six areas where due enquiry had not been made. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
Brugmann v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
January 2013 692pp Hbk 9781849463423 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol 14 2011-2012 Edited by Catherine Barnard and Markus Gehring with Iyiola Solanke The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies provides a [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
Rajiv then came up with a penetrating analysis of an IPAB decision (Bayer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 8:55 pm
The case of Ali Shaygan v. [read post]
