Search for: "State v. Martinez-Mendoza"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Guevara-Martinez, 262 F.3d 751, 754-55 (8th Cir.2001) (same), with United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:02 pm
Mendoza-Martinez in 1963, the Mendoza-Martinez factors were "useful guideposts" in an inquiry as to whether a statute challenged on ex post facto grounds had a punitive effect. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
Most compelling in a review of the Mendoza-Martinez factors is that the State has a very important non-punitive purpose in enacting this designation provision and it has tailored a limited provision to deal with this purpose. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:12 pm
State, 189 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2008), the Indiana Supreme Court held that the state's sex offender registration and notification scheme was punitive under the Mendoza-Martinez factors and, as such, application of its requirements to an offender convicted and sentenced prior to the initial passage of the law was unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:20 pm
Mendoza–Martinez. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
” (Mendoza, p. 20, Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
The Court appears to be holding Mendoza v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:24 pm
The Maine decision is State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 pm
Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963), and restated by the Court in Hudson. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
With respect to the specific Article 10 provision at issue in this proceeding, Section 10.07(c), in 2010, in State of New York v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:32 pm
The Court of Appeals held that the residency restriction is punitive (per Mendoza-Martinez) and, therefore, Apprendi requires a hearing where facts supporting the imposition of the residency requirement are proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
Maria Guadalupe Mendoza has published The Thirteen Known Latina Litigants Before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:10 am
A year later, Vilma Martinez, the first known Mexican American woman to appear before the Supreme Court, argued East Texas Motor Freight Sys., v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:30 pm
Washburn student intern Amy Ahrens and I won in State v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:21 am
Mendoza-Martinez (1963), a remarkably comparable case: "[T]he Fifth and Sixth Amendments mandate that this punishment cannot be imposed without a prior criminal trial and all its incidents, including indictment, notice, confrontation, jury trial, assistance of counsel, and compulsory process for obtaining witnesses. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:43 am
In Smith v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Mendoza-Martinez 2-18-1963 Question:Did Section 401(j) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, divesting U.S. citizens of their citizenship for remaining outside the United States during a time of war or national emergency in order to avoid the draft, violate the procedural safeguard of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments? [read post]
