Search for: "State v. Marty" Results 1 - 20 of 584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 9:08 am by Immigration Prof
United States: Fifth Circuit declares President Reagan's immigration regulation unlawful," Marty Lederman offers some interesting insights about Texas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 4:06 am by Benjamin Wittes
  Justice O’Connor’s controlling plurality opinion in the leading case, Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:09 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
He argues: (1) the State presented insufficient evidence to support the conviction; (2) his counsel [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm by Derek Muller
Harper… Continue reading The post Some thoughts on state power to conduct presidential primaries (and why the Moore v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully formed’ —… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:21 am by laborprof lpb
Marty Katz (Denver) has posted on SSRN his new piece in the Penn State Law Review: Gross Disunity. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
On this week’s Lawfare Podcast, Lawfare Founding Editor Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman—Georgetown law professor, Just Security blogger, and former Justice Department official—sat down to discuss the Supreme Court’s sweeping ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
On this week’s Lawfare Podcast, Lawfare Founding Editor Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman—Georgetown law professor, Just Security blogger, and former Justice Department official—sat down to discuss the Supreme Court’s sweeping ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]