Search for: "State v. Maurice A. Fields"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2021, 5:47 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Involuntary field sobriety test A jury in the Circuit Court for Charles County convicted appellant, Michael Maurice Ford, of grossly negligent manslaughter by vehicle, negligent homicide by vehicle while under the influence of alcohol per se, and related offenses. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh CaseRichard Clayton9. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
Maurice Kay LJ then considered whether it was disproportionate to deny a right of residence to a person in the position of the appellant, particularly in the light of Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] ECR I-7091. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
District Judge Maurice B. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
" So the case of State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
However, the Court of Appeals stated that the case of Bynum v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
However, the panel in James Maurice Melnick v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:29 pm
Maurice Ettinghausen Collection, Special & Historical Collections, HLSL. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Mount v Hodder & Staughton Limited, 16 January 2014 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
” Many fields use “quotation” to include use of a full work, no requirement of commentary, no requirement of “quotation marks. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The panel discussion was on the doctrine of equivalents following the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
