Search for: "State v. Maximo"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court recognized in Tinker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Fraser & Angela V. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:18 am
Cullen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:27 pm
” Because it was undisputed that the employer’s offer of over $3K accounted for double the amount of overtime pay to which she was owed (thus accounting for liquidated damages), and no other procedural complications prevented entry of judgment since no other putative collective plaintiffs had opted into the action, the court concluded that entry of judgment on her FLSA claim was proper (Maximo v. 140 Green Laundromat, July 7, 2015, Failla, K.). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
