Search for: "State v. McCartney"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2009, 5:26 am
: Microsoft v i4i (IPKat) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Copyright When pirates become copyright cash cows (TorrentFreak) Can copyright save the newspaper industry? [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
McCartney, and Elizabeth A. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Swire, Ohio State University (OSU) – Michael E. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
* Hamptons resident Paul McCartney is now officially divorced. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
The North Carolina Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for those with cerebral palsy within the State of North Carolina. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Hilen v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Do these documents fully account for the SCC’s important ruling in the ESAC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
He said: “The key would be to make the cards available only to members of print newsgathering organisations or magazines who have signed up the new body and its code… The public at large would know journalists carrying such cards are bone fide operators committed to a set of standards and a body to who complaints can be made…I think the beauty of the system, the attraction of the system, is it will be the newspaper industry registering and disciplining journalists, not the… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
We have Mills v McCartney: Mr Justice Bennett, in a 58 page judgment, the only Family Law judgment I have read in thirty years, makes his views quite clear. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
That view cannot, so it seems to me, survive the opening words of FPR 27.11, which expressly state that the right granted to journalists is to attend a hearing held in private. [read post]
