Search for: "State v. McCollum" Results 41 - 60 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am by Marty Lederman
Yoder, but merely returns the law to the state as it existed prior to Smith. . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:49 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
McCollum, the United States Supreme Court, citing “a long tradition... [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by admin
In violation of SOX and Halliburton’s stated policy, Menendez’s complaint to Halliburton’s Audit Committee was forwarded to KPMG, the CFO, and McCollum. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm by admin
In violation of SOX and Halliburton’s stated policy, Menendez’s complaint to Halliburton’s Audit Committee was forwarded to KPMG, the CFO, and McCollum. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
The few states that recognize medical monitoring as a remedy recognize it as a cause of action, like Pennsylvania, Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. [read post]