Search for: "State v. McCourt"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 9:33 am
McCOURT V. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:14 am
McCourt also promised this seven years ago, and failed to follow through. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:36 pm
A leased employee sufficiently stated a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress where her complaint alleged that she repeatedly complained to her direct supervisor about sexual harassment, including being told she was “f*ckable,” invited for a lunch-time “quickie,” and touched inappropriately; her direct supervisor (and the company) ratified the conduct by telling her to “ignore it and smile;” and as a consequence, she developed a rash and… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:00 am
He has provided trial presentation services in many high-profile and high-stakes matters, including the Dodgers McCourt divorce and People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:55 pm
t.co/evY24sY 5th: Ct may consult disclosure statement to see if claims retained & post-confirm. debtor has standing to bring them. t.co/evY24sY D-PA considers but wont decide effect of Anti-Injunction Act on §105 inj. ag. enforcement of state jdgmt vs. nondebtor. t.co/NmqwlYq D-PA wont hear mot. for stay pending appeal of BK order when stay not 1st sought in BK Ct even if a request was futile. t.co/NmqwlYq 6th: BK trustee liable in official capacity… [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm
Via Swift 1st Limited v McCourt the exercise of a like unilateral discretion in a mortgage contract such as that relied on in this case by the plaintiff must not be unreasonable (in the Wednesbury sense), dishonest, for an improper purpose, capricious or arbitrary, but the relevant discretion in the present cases is not in my opinion inherently unfair. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
With regard to “sufficient interest” of campaigning groups or individuals, in their written submissions the petitioners made reference to the considerations by the Administrative Court (Macur LJ, Chamberlain J) in R (McCourt) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2020] EWHC 2320 (Admin). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am
State of California). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
