Search for: "State v. McKinley" Results 121 - 140 of 218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:13 am by Howard Friedman
Governor for the State of Alabama, (11th Cir., April 2, 2014), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a number of claims by an Odinist inmate, including his complaint that he was denied religious items (rune container, leather folder for study materials, quartz crystal and outdoor fire pit); claims of retaliation; security threat group designation; destruction of his artwork; and his challenge to the prison's faith-based honor dorm.In McKinley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:30 am by Doorey
 That law is easy enough to state, and the Court cites the Ontario decision in  Kieran v Ingram Micro Inc., [2004] OJ No. 3118 (ONCA) for the principle: A resignation must be clear and unequivocal. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am by William G. Ross
  During the next four years, the Court’s decisions, particularly Miranda v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:00 am by Catherine Coulter
  He also referenced the contextual approach set out in the leading case of McKinley v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  The consequences of just cause dismissal are that the employee does not receive employment insurance benefits or reasonable notice or payment in lieu of termination.[18] The leading case in Canada on dismissal for cause is McKinley.[19] In this case, the Supreme Court of Canada held that just cause for dismissal is where the employee’s work place breach gives rise to a breakdown in the employment relationship.[20] The Court concluded that just cause exists where the… [read post]