Search for: "State v. McMahon"
Results 121 - 140
of 265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
It is noteworthy that Judge McMahon, although ultimately finding in favor of the government, spent most of her opinion expressing significant sympathy for the arguments urging greater disclosure. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
” Research & resources Blackstone’s Guide to the Defamation Act 2013, edited by James Price QC and Felicity McMahon (see our post). [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:44 am
” Military Judge James Pohl, who is overseeing the key military commission cases, has set the date for the trial in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 57-page opinion this week in Marvel Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
In State v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:00 am
Colleen McMahon). [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School: A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
McMahon and Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
” (slip op. at 17-18) The same treason argument, of course, was put forward unsuccessfully by Justice Scalia in dissent in Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:53 am
No. 198 v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
McMahon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 1:36 pm
He cites as an example the recent Court of Appeal decision in Axis Surplus v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
& subrog. claims are solely BK issues not bound by State Ct holding that Bank owed Dbtr no duty http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HarbourEastDevp-BK-SD-FL-Cristol-10-27-11.pdf … B-MA: Failure to comply w/FRBP 2002(c)(3) for notice of plan injunction precludes confirmation w/injunctive provisions. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/QuincyMedicalCtr-BK-D-MA-Hoffman-11-16-11.pdf … B-MA: Plan's third party releases are… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
McMahon. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
