Search for: "State v. McManus"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
UNITE HERE Local 100 v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
* Tenure by estoppel or acquiesce results "when a school board accepts the continued services of a teacher or administrator, but fails to take the action required by law to either grant or deny tenure prior to the expiration of the teacher's probationary term" [McManus v Bd. of Educ. of Hempstead UFSD, 87 NY2d 183]. ** See Education Law §2509[1][a]; §3014[1] N.B. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:04 am
McManus v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
Attaining tenure by estoppelLilley v Mills, App. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Shapiro v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Shapiro v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
** See, also, Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of the Mahopac Cent. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:12 am
That was the predicament that the employee in McManus v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 8:10 am
McManus , listed as a shareholder, specializing in Litigation, at the Ft. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:03 am
McManus. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
” Bill Mears of CNN reports on the decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:51 am
.* At the end of the extended probationary period the school district may grant or deny tenure [see Juul v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:52 am
” Washington Post v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court of Canada simplifies the standard of review analysis in historic Super Bowl trilogy https://t.co/HNcpK4qXYK 2019-12-22 EU High Court Rules Against Digital Resale; We’ll Talk About This at the Conference https://t.co/SYM5ATw238 2019-12-22 Enersen not enforced in Wilson v Huuge, 9th Circ. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court of Canada simplifies the standard of review analysis in historic Super Bowl trilogy https://t.co/HNcpK4qXYK 2019-12-22 EU High Court Rules Against Digital Resale; We’ll Talk About This at the Conference https://t.co/SYM5ATw238 2019-12-22 Enersen not enforced in Wilson v Huuge, 9th Circ. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Ltd v Parle Agro Pvt. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:47 am
Thus, the record was sufficient to present triable questions of fact regarding the employee’s wrongful discharge, IIED, and conversion claims (McManus v. [read post]
