Search for: "State v. McPhail" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2008, 11:16 pm
How does the logic from Dew and McPhail fare post-Clinton v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:41 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued April 27, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Kerbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
United States, and American Needle v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]