Search for: "State v. Meighan"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
in Frederick v Meighan ;2010 NY Slip Op 06076 ;Appellate Division, Second Department we see the effect of Attorney 2 failing to clean up Attorney 1's mistakes. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Baum, P.C., may be liable to the Stein defendants for causing or contributing to the plaintiff's alleged damages (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 6; see also Frederick v Meighan, 75 AD3d 528, 532). [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
” State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
State v. [read post]
