Search for: "State v. Michael"
Results 181 - 200
of 13,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 6:11 am
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, Bryant Tullous, Michael Esmay. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:39 am
Motor Vehicles OWI; probable cause Michael Barahona appeals judgments of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, first offense (OWI), contrary to Wis. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:48 am
” But Burdick v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 1:00 pm
” Now United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
New Jersey Secretary of State. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm
In January 2023, a federal district court in Texas dismissed Michael v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:27 am
In the most recent issue of the NYU Survey of American Law, Professor Michael Allen, Stetson University College of Law, published Of Remedy, Juries, and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
Here's a story from Michael Kunzelman of the Associated Press on opening statements in the trial.... [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:18 pm
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:03 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Michael A. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:29 pm
The Hidden Logic of a Recent Retroactivity Case in the Supreme Court," is the title of Columbia law prof Michael Dorf.Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:00 am
Michael L. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
Et al. v MercExchange LLC, 547 U.S. 388 (2006) [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:00 am
Michael A. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:03 am
The super-size soda ban, a program advocated by NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is not constitutional according to the unanimous opinion from a state appellate court in New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:33 pm
Michael Moore held unconstitutional Florida regulations that classify U.S. citizen students who reside in Florida as "out of state" residents according to their parents' undocumented federal immigration status in the opinion in Ruiz v. [read post]
