Search for: "State v. Milk" Results 61 - 80 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 6:56 am by Eric Lipman
United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm by Larry
I need to give you a post on GRK Canada v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
 In Dean, Milwaukee dairies challenged the city of Madison's law prohibiting the sale of milk produced more than five miles from the center of the city.Indeed, it was our old friend the Interstate Commerce Clause that was relied upon in the 1941 case of Edwards v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
A supplement purchaser stated California consumer protection law claims against a supplement manufacturer for allegedly making false and misleading advertising statements, the federal district court in Oakland, California, has held.The majority of the purchaser’s first amended complaint that the manufacturer falsely advertised its Muscle Milk Ready–To-Drink and Muscle Milk Bars was dismissed (CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,442).The court… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:00 am by Colleen McGushin
District Court for the Northern District of Iowa neatly summed up the law and the issue on July 19 in Salz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Vodka & Milk, LLC, 1:17-cv-08603-JSR (SDNY March 15, 2018) Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * Section 512(f) Complaint Survives Motion to Dismiss–Johnson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Last month, in International Dairy Foods Association v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:08 am by Michael J. Mueller
The State and Creamery agreed that there is substantial government interest to regulate milk and milk products. [read post]