Search for: "State v. Millett"
Results 121 - 140
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 1:55 pm
v=w8ydBekmEOw [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:27 am
Judge Millett filed a dissenting opinion (Ward v McDonald, August 12, 2014, Henderson, K). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
While serving in that role, she was one of the attorneys who wrote the U.S. government's brief in City of Boerne v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:25 am
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. ") AC34059 - Millette v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
It focuses on the doctrine we call the political status doctrine, first articulated by the Supreme Court in Morton v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am
Adam Liptak wrote about my favorite exchange of the day: The question for the justices was whether that state law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allows voters to register using a federal form that asks, “Are you a citizen of the United States? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
Justice Department event marking the 50th anniversary of the high court's landmark Gideon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:12 am
State Univ., 299 F.3d 1053, 1064 (9th Cir.2002).5 Fed.R.Evid. 702 (2010)6Barabin v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:47 am
On July 27, 2012, a jury in the matter of Michael Galliher v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Millett 3 John J. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
This blog also posted a Q&A with Patricia Millett, head of Akin Gump’s Supreme Court litigation practice and co-chair of the national appellate practice. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
Patchak, consolidated with Salazar v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:06 pm
Justice Millette wrote the opinion for the majority. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
Background David Patchak, the respondent in Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35 both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
Millett thus emphasized Mr. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
http://j.st/GmY Field v. [read post]
