Search for: "State v. Milne" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2015, 8:32 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Council, 186 N.J. 127, 141 n.2 (2006), for same and noting “objective of [Rule 1:10-3] hearing is simply to determine whether . . . failure [to comply with an order] was excusable or willful”); Milne v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:51 am
  As Matthew Levitt, a partner at Lovells has stated, the Commission will only be further encouraged to pursue zero-tolerance against governmental restrictions, and this will only serve to increase the potential for cross-border mergers.[26] ____________ Endnotes: [1] Case C-112/05, Comm'n v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:03 am by asam90
In practice, however, U.N. bodies have requested advisory opinions in situations where there is an underlying dispute between states. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This wrongly states that Impress made the damages award. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd Jassin
  The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:44 am by Michael Oykhman
The concept of colour of right is not set out in the Code, rather caselaw such as R v Dorosh, 2003 SKCA 134 describes it as “an honest belief in a state of facts, which if it actually existed would at law justify or excuse the act done. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Daniel Milnes of Forbes Solicitors states: “While using drones may result in saving money in maintenance in the short term, if legal obligations are not seriously considered it could cost a housing association much more if it resulted in a data protection breach. [read post]