Search for: "State v. Milos" Results 1 - 20 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2012, 7:59 am by Ariel Greenberg
 The culmination of a lengthy court battle, this decision bars the claim by New York resident Leon Fischer and Czech citizen Milos Vavra, the heirs of Franz [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:33 am
Rainer Klump (Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main) & Miloš Vec (Max-Planck-Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte) have published Völkerrecht und Weltwirtschaft im 19. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
 The judge rejected in this regard the contrary conclusion that our Constitutional Court reached in S v Mamabolo. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
This article originally appeared in the “Sunday Times” in South Africa and is reproduced with permission and thanks Dario Milo, partner at Webber Wentzel attorneys in Johannesburg, where he specialises in media law. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The most important case was ironically one in which the media was not directly involved: City of Cape Town v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Dr Dario Milo is a partner at Webber Wentzel and an adjunct professor at Wits University. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Dario Milo, is a partner at Webber Wentzel and adjunct professor of media law at Wits University, acted for Sole and amaBhungane in this case. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Motsepe case followed a decision of our Supreme Court of Appeal in 2009 in the State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 4 February 2021, the Constitutional Court handed down its decision in the case of AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC  v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2021] ZACC 3. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:39 am
Cellphones and Insurgent Violence in Iraq Stephen Chaudoin, Helen V. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]