Search for: "State v. Monk"
Results 121 - 140
of 152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2010, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In McCann v UK, which preceded Cosic, the ECtHR not surprisingly found that the rule in Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk similarly breached Article 8 because of the lack of procedural safeguards (see especially paras [53]-[54]). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Peterson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 4:10 am
Lund, Salazar v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The other repeat player is the subject-matter of the application: is the rule in Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk, about which we have written much in the past year or so, compatible with Article 8? [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The other repeat player is the subject-matter of the application: is the rule in Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk, about which we have written much in the past year or so, compatible with Article 8? [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:12 am
Doody v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
[V]iral videos and blog posts are becoming the samizdat of our day.... [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 am
The purpose of the meeting was to hear the renunciation or reaffirmation by the monk Martin Luther of dissident views. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Bob Monks recently blogged about his experience of attending the SCOTUS' Jones v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Furthermore, federal and state government regulators frequently lack the resources and political support to perform effective oversight functions or bring enforcement actions. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Kelvin Rutledge, again rather valiantly, submitted an argument drawing on certain sentences from the judgments in Hammersmith & Fulham v Monk and Crawley BC v Ure but these cases involved joint tenants and were not relevant to this issue. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
Hoyle v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Some interesting items have crossed my desk on Friday and Saturday: From the Grand Theft: Property blog, Jim Mattson posts his thoughts about Monks v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) Development Moratorium a Taking Under Lucas - Monks v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
