Search for: "State v. Morales" Results 21 - 40 of 7,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Congratulations to Bethany Berger upon her receipt of the Perry Zirkel ’76 Distinguished Teaching Award at UConn Law (UConn Today).Christine Lamberson, Director, Federal Judicial History Office, has a post on Chy Lung v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am by Frank Cranmer
The impugned decrees stated that, where animals were slaughtered in accordance with special methods required for religious rites, the stunning method applied would be reversible and non-lethal. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Natalia Kubesch
However, significant concerns persist around whether the confiscation of State-linked assets would be  compliant with domestic and international laws relating to State immunity. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm by Amy Howe
After that ruling, 21 states either banned or significantly limited access to abortion. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
It violates their conscience by requiring them to provide or participate in care that they “find morally and ethically objectionable. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]