Search for: "State v. Moses" Results 181 - 200 of 415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am by INFORRM
 In an interview with the Press Gazette IPSO Chairman, Sir Alan Moses, admitted it was not Leveson compliant but insisted it would be independent. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm by SJM
Following Stec v UK and R (Carson) v SSWP, it was settled law that the allocation of state resources was a matter for Parliament and the government and not the Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am by SHG
CERTIORARI DENIED… 13-1012 VANGELDER, TERRY V. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In 1943, the Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
Also noteworthy are 17th-century Russian religious debates as to how many fingers one should cross oneself with (f) and how many times one should say “Hallelujah” in the liturgy (h) (new style f = 3, h = 3 v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
” Lord Reed continues that, “The Convention taken by itself is too inspecific [sic] to provide the guidance which is necessary in a state governed by the rule of law….The Convention cannot therefore be treated as if it were Moses and the prophets. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am by chief
Moses LJ cites R (JL) v Secretary of State for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) as an example of a proportionality assessment being conducted in JR (our note here, this decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal: [2013] EWCA Civ 449).Nor did s.5, 1977 Act, apply so that the detailed requirements for NTQs needed to be followed. [read post]