Search for: "State v. Muldoon"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
Muldoon entered into a structured settlement with the United States in 1982. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:56 pm
. ***** Last week, Rochester criminal defense attorney Gary Muldoon was kind enough to bring to my attention an interesting Texas decision: Youkers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:44 pm
Doyle, Marie Muldoon & Clíodhna Murphy, Education in Ireland: accessible without discrimination for all? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 8:17 am
The case is Two Rivers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
Good work Gary Muldoon. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
By Andrew DelaneyState v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
By Andrew DelaneyState v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Applying the maxim "ask, and thou shalt not receive," the district judge in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
In Handling a Criminal Case in New York § 23:35 [2013], Gary Muldoon notes that “[i]t is a basic tenet of appellate practice that it is improper for an attorney to argue matters that are dehors (outside) the record on appeal” (see also, e.g., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
Likewise, in Patterson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Of course, consider the flip side of this decision, where the defendant was represented by my old friend Gary Muldoon. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:29 am
State, 109 So. 3d 874 (Fla. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
ALASKA STATE RESOURCES AGING Alaska Commission on Aging P.O. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The Charter spurned even further changes to electoral enfranchisement, with the first 500 federally-appointed judges casting their votes in 1988, following the decision in Muldoon v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 8:39 pm
Williams State v. [read post]
