Search for: "State v. Mulholland" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals affirms the verdict.The case is Mulholland v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Francis writes:   "To recover on a claim for an account stated under New York law, the plaintiff must show that: "'(1) an account was presented; (2) it was accepted as correct; and (3) [the] debtor promised to pay the amount stated.'" Camacho Mauro Mulholland LLP v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To establish an account stated, there must be a mutual examination of the claims of the respective parties, a balance struck, an agreement either express or implied that the balance is correct, and that the party against whom it is found will pay it (Bank of New York-Del. v Santarelli, 128 Misc 2d 1003, 1004 [County Ct, Greene County 1985]).A client has “an absolute right, at any time, with or without cause, to terminate theattorney-client relationship by discharging the… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:07 am by Jessica Mulholland
  Attendees will receive the presentation slide deck, sample data inventory and instructions, a CPRA v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:30 am
WalkerIn February of 2008, the state Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District held in Douda v. [read post]