Search for: "State v. Mulligan" Results 21 - 40 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 1:42 pm by Paul Ohm
This meant that the police in those three states were free to ignore the Fourth Amendment when obtaining email messages from a provider. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:25 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Specifically, on May 23, 2014, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:25 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Specifically, on May 23, 2014, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm by Georgialee Lang
They relied on the Supreme Court of Canada’s earlier decision in Trinity Western University v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In Founding-Era Translations of the United States Constitution, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn analyze how these translations might aid interpretation of the Constitution today.Of greatest interest to readers of this blog is likely the Progress Clause:English: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries . . . .German: Die… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:18 am by SHG
Lett, a chance to make sense of their predecessors' decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
Or footnote 6, which defines "shanking," or footnote 7, which defines what a "mulligan" is.I was surprised not to see a footnote defining what a "five dollar Nassau" is. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:28 am by Chuck Becker
 (Note: While I certainly hope that EPA is correct in saying that it has no impact, the United States Supreme Court might disagree with that assessment as it did in last term’s case of Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:54 am by Yvonne Daly
A decision was handed down by the High Court yesterday in the case of Mulligan v Governer of Portlaoise Prison, which, as noted here before, involved a claim for damages from a former prisoner of Portlaoise Prison based on the assertion that the practice of “slopping out” was humiliating, degrading, and in breach of his constitutional and human rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]