Search for: "State v. Muniz"
Results 61 - 80
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am
Finally, the Tax Court upheld the imposition of a section 6662 accuracy-related penalty, pointing out, among other things, that the taxpayer had been advised to seek a tax professional’s opinion but that she did not introduce any evidence that she relied on professional tax advice.In the other case, Muniz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
— Muniz v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:38 am
In 2012’s State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), finds no ineffectiveness by defense attorneys who fall asleep during the cross-examination of their client (Muniz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:05 am
Muniz, 496 US 582 (1990). [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
This topic is discussed in the case, Muniz v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am
Muniz. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am
Muniz. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am
Muniz. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The Western District of Michigan aptly summarized what remains the current state of Michigan law:As a result of [M.C.L. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:44 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 10:03 pm
Co., 840 F.3d 1159, 116263 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Muniz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
