Search for: "State v. Music" Results 81 - 100 of 4,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 pm by Chris Castle
Congress clearly states that anyone purchasing a bulk copy of the musical works database must pay the marginal cost to the MLC. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:49 am
The RIAA has responded to the defendants' submission of the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Latin American Music v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
  “The holding and distribution of funds by the [Collective] … shall supersede and preempt any State law … concerning escheatment or abandoned property. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:45 pm by LTA-Editor
Well, it depends on a “seismic” case we wrote about last April, and that was decided in September of 2014: Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
One can imagine this turning into a case similar to that of Tiffany v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 The Appeal Court stated, however, that Jury Instruction No. 16 correctly listed non-protectable musical building blocks that no individual may own, and did not, as Skidmore claimed, exclude the particular use of musical elements in an original expression.Clarifying the tests for infringement and non-protectable elements of music could be a welcomed relief to the growing number of cases where similar songs are found to have been infringing. [read post]