Search for: "State v. Muzzy" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Third District Holds CEQA Does Not Authorize “Remedy” of “Limited EIR” To Augment Deficient MND; Rather, Full EIR Must Be Prepared Where Substantial Evidence Supports Fair Argument That Any Aspect Of Project May Have Significant Environmental Effect
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
Metropolitan Water Dist. (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 382, 402 & fn. 11; Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A Decade of CEQA Developments
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Supreme Court, in Tomlinson v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A “Fare” Shake? Ninth Circuit Affirms Judgment On the Pleadings for San Francisco In Removed Action Challenging SFMTA’s 2018 Taxi Regulations, Remands for Consideration of Whether to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Amend CEQA Claim
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Diego (”UMMP”) (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 (my post on which can be found here) and Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Not A CEQA “Project”? Not So Fast, Lead Agency! Supreme Court Reverses Fourth District’s Decision That San Diego’s Adoption of Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Was Not A Project Requiring CEQA Review
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument In CEQA Project Definition Case
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The questioning at oral argument was dominated by Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, who observed early on that the binding precedent of Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Five Years in the Making: California is One Step Closer to a Comprehensive Update to the CEQA Guidelines
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am by Jeffrey Forrest, Whitney Hodges, Alex Merritt and Lauren Chang
Such programs and thresholds will likely dovetail with state and local efforts to meet GHG reduction targets set by the state or in local climate action plans. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
The Opposite of CEQA Reform: Legally Flawed AB 890 Would Expand Opportunities for CEQA Litigation Abuse While Abridging Constitutional Local Initiative Rights
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Bryan W. Wenter, AICP
  (Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Opposite of CEQA Reform: Legally Flawed AB 890 Would Expand Opportunities for CEQA Litigation Abuse While Abridging Constitutional Local Initiative Rights
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Bryan W. Wenter, AICP
  (Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Longtime Supreme Court CEQA Maven, Justice Kathryn Werdegar, Announces Retirement
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Blowing Smoke About Impacts? Fourth District Rejects Speculative CEQA Challenge to San Diego’s Medical Marijuana Consumer Cooperative Ordinance, Holds Zoning Ordinances Are Not Necessarily CEQA “Projects”
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds CEQA’s Definition of “Project” Does Not Encompass Municipal Ordinance Merely Restating Existing Prohibition of Mobile Marijuana Dispensaries
25 Mar 2016, 3:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” (Quoting Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments: A Critique of OPR’s “Preliminary Discussion Draft” (Part III – Proposed “Minor Technical Improvements”)
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (E.g., Saltonstall v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Supreme Court Construes CEQA’s “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to Categorical Exemptions in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley Decision
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Work Done Under Unchallenged CEQA Emergency Exemption Held Part Of Existing Environment Baseline In Subsequent CEQA Challenge To Permanent Permits
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
…” (Quoting Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Tentative Map Approval Is CEQA “Project”, Holds Third District In Published Opinion Also Addressing Prejudicial Error, Agency Discretion To Adopt Thresholds Of Significance, Deferred Mitigation, And Other Significant CEQA Issues
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
OPR To Review Specific CEQA Guidelines Topics Proposed For 2014 Update, Solicits Public Input
29 Jan 2014, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (See Muzzy Ranch v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
New and Old Originalisms, Taxes, and the Establishment Clause
8 Jul 2012, 7:35 am by Marc DeGirolami
  Even the issue of direct tax support of churches was not universally understood to mean an "establishment" (see, e.g., Chief Justice Smith's opinion in the New Hampshire Supreme Court decision, Muzzy v. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
Land Use Planning Near California Airports Could Change Your Development Plans
22 Jul 2010, 9:04 am by Berne C. Hart
  As the California Supreme Court stated in Muzzy Ranch v. [read post]
Aviation and Airport Development Law - http://www.aviationairportdevelopmentlaw.com/