Search for: "State v. Naas" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
The lead judgment is by Baroness Hale, who rehearses the history of the NAA and in particular the interaction with immigration law after R v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, Ex parte M (1997) 30 HLR 10 S.21 now states: Subject to and in accordance with the provisions of this Part of this Act, a local authority may with the approval of the Secretary of State, and to such extent as he may direct shall, make arrangements for providing: (a) residential… [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 andPinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" SL also received medical support via prescription, whichis excluded from consideration under s.21(1)(a) by s.21(8) NAA 1948. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" SL also received medical support via prescription, whichis excluded from consideration under s.21(1)(a) by s.21(8) NAA 1948. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis
Naas Foods, Inc., 959 F.2d 69, 71-72 (7th Cir. 1992). [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:09 am
The court granted the motion, explaining: (1) that the statute of limitations began to run no later than June 2005, when Unifund filed suit against plaintiff, id., at 1059 (citing Naas v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm by NL
The Court considered R(M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) as the leading case on s.21(1). [read post]