Search for: "State v. Nabarro"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
In this post, Stephanie Cheung, Mitchell Abbott and Jana Blahova of CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40 and consider how the decision impacts on the doctrine of lawful economic duress. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:58 pm
UK Registry to warn TM owners of dangers of conflictThe IPKat recently received a note from Guy Heath (Nabarro Nathanson) on the current state of play with regard to trade mark oppositions in the United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Ryan Dolby-Stevens (Olswang), Natalie Hall (CMS), Jonathan Scrine (Nabarro), Jack Ballantyne (Olswang), Clementine Bottet (Nabarro) & Cathryn Hopkins (Olswang). 16.32: James Eadie QC submits that any control by Parliament of the royal prerogative has been via express provision. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The UKSC Blog will publish a live blog of this hearing in conjunction with lawyers from CMS, Nabarro, Olswang and Matrix. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
The article reported on what was stated in the Letter. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
Secretary of State of Energy and Climate Change [20.09.2013], Mansfield County Court, in which District Judge Davies, having heard submissions from both parties, ruled in favour of the Defendant (represented by Nabarro LLP) and held that NIHL is not a disease within the meaning of CPR 45.23 and therefore the 62.5% success fee did not apply. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
All bloggers are CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP Associates and Trainee Solicitors. [read post]
