Search for: "State v. Nathaniel B. Kind" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
The TRIPs Agreement protects trade secrets so long as such information (a) is secret in the sense that it is not, as a body or in the precise configuration and assembly of its components, generally known among or readily accessible to persons within the circles that normally deal with the kind of information in question; (b) has commercial value because it is secret; and (c) has been subject to reasonable steps under the circumstances, by the person lawfully in control of the… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
Nathaniel Jackson, 2010 Ohio 5054; 2010 Ohio App. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Gillies, Comment, Not with a bang, but a whimper: Congress’s proposal to overturn the Supreme Court’s Leegin decision with the Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act of 2009, 18 VILLANOVA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 645 (2011)Nathaniel Grow, Louisville v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
But you very much defended your actions, and stated clearly that you are not interested in any kind of diversity training. [read post]