Search for: "State v. Navarrete"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 1:33 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
I will say that my sense is that while I agree with Justice Rubin that Navarrete isn't totally obviously guilty, I do think he's in deep trouble, and may well have committed the offenses for which he was charged. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:56 am
So I can't state the first reason. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 3:02 pm
(See Navarrete v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:07 pm
DUI checkpoints must be conducted under the guidelines of Ingersoll v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:29 am
Lobo de Souza, Revisiting the Right of Self-Defence against Non-State Armed Entities Notes and Comments Michael Carfagnini, Too Low a Threshold: Bilcon v Canada and the International Minimum Standard of Treatment François Larocque & Christiane Bossé, Kazemi ou l’inhumaine immunité de l’État tortionnaire en droit canadien [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
How Foucault's 'Confessions of the Flesh' Sheds New Light on the Concept of Freedom and the Genealogy of the Modern Critical Attitude, (Le foucaldien 7, no. 1, pp. 1-11 (2021)).Agustina Ramón Michel & Sonia Ariza Navarrete, Unexpected Uses of and Responses to Conscientious Objection to Legal Abortion, (REDAAS N° 13 January 2021).Fiona A. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
Agents & Brokers v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Vilches-Navarrete, No. 06-1942 Conviction and sentence for cocaine possession in violation of Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act ("MDLEA") and conspiracy to distribute cocaine is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) the MDLEA is unconstitutional; 2) the district court lacked jurisdiction; 3) the district court erroneously refused to suppress evidence; 4) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and 5) his sentence was unreasonable under Booker; and 6)… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
(citing State Farm Life Ins. [read post]
