Search for: "State v. Neighbors" Results 21 - 40 of 3,456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:45 am by DONALD SCARINCI
As relevant to the case, state plans must detail how each State would satisfy the Act’s “good neighbor” provision, which requires “upwind States to reduce emissions to account for pollution exported beyond their borders. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm by Ilya Somin
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Guest Contributor
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The ridiculous approach to dilution: because one statutory provision says use as a mark, the neighboring one that doesn’t use that language must also have that concept: As Graeme Dinwoodie said to me, even if you don’t agree that expressio unis should mean that the noncommercial use exception doesn’t have a use as a mark requirement, you should still easily recognize that the 2006 revision of dilution was designed to expand the defenses, not contract them. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:18 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Shortly thereafter, the deputy stated that a second car had gone down the mountain, at which time the dispatcher stated that she would ask a neighboring county to block the road. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says qualified immunity cannot attach at this early stage of the case.The case is Mehaylo v. [read post]