Search for: "State v. Neuberger" Results 1 - 20 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 7:45 am by Wendy
For those of you interested in which cases were chosen, the list is below: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
” Lord Neuberger also raised the question of whether anonymous speech is even capable of protection in the Internet age, and remarked on Mr Justice Eady’s conclusions in Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB), that bogging is a public activity with no reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
Lords Mance and Neuberger dissented, holding that the debts were owed to the CBI alone, which was fatal to the appeal. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
In Abdulaziz v Apex [2014] UKSC 64 Lord Neuberger stated that while it would be “wrong in principle for this court to refuse to entertain an appeal against a decision simply because it involved case management and the application of the CPR”, both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal should be “very diffident about interfering” with the decisions of their respective lower courts. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:54 pm by Hugh Southey QC, Matrix
The panel will be Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Carnwarth, Tolson and Hodge. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am by Sam Murrant
In the courts MK & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWHC 1896 (Admin) Failed asylum seekers should be able to apply for housing support whilst making fresh applications. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Hughes, and Toulson. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am by Legal Support Service
In regards to Mr Samin, Neuberger stated that his art 18 right was also limited to the scope of the Treaties and therefore his argument also failed for the same reasons as Ms Mirga’s. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:42 am by Jack Ballantyne
  With reference to judicial inconsistency on a point of disclosure in the judgment of Vernon v Bosley , Lord Neuberger then demonstrated that litigation best practice had in some areas been left in a “state of complete uncertainty”. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 11:38 am by christopher
(case recently noted by Jeffrey Neuberger at PBS/Media Shift) UMG Recording v. [read post]