Search for: "State v. Neville" Results 1 - 20 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 5:48 am by Adam Steinman
Nevils, which presents the following questions: Whether FEHBA preempts state laws that prevent carriers from seeking subrogation or reimbursement pursuant to their FEHBA contracts. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:31 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
The parents of the children, Edward Neville and Jennifer Neville-Lake, were not in the minivan. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 7:12 am by Steven Wildberger
Nevils [SCOTUSblog backgrounder], a case that required the court to decide whether an insurer, guaranteed a right of subrogation through a Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (FEHBA) policy, actually has such a right when it is in contravention of the law of the state in which it seeks recovery. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm by NL
" This is supported by the decision in Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 25 The letter in April 2008 was not such as could give rise to a legitimate expectation. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm by NL
" This is supported by the decision in Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 25 The letter in April 2008 was not such as could give rise to a legitimate expectation. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm by Miracle Jones
The US Supreme Court [official website] on Friday granted certiorari [order, PDF] in Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:11 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 12:00 am by Thomas J. Bean and Christine A. Gaddis
From December 5 to December 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard argument in the case of Secretary of State v. [read post]
From December 5 to December 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard argument in the case of Secretary of State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]