Search for: "State v. Nist" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 1:33 pm by Stewart Baker
Not surprisingly, that sounds like a great idea to the United States’ foremost practitioner of selective enforcement, the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] If SEC or other proposed federal regulation of cybersecurity becomes a reality, implementing the Framework could be a mandatory exercise. [read post]
If the entity is outside of the United States, there are questions of accountability and whether proper recourse exists. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:15 am by Gene Quinn
These words were spoken on the morning after the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Oil States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:15 am by Gene Quinn
These words were spoken on the morning after the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Oil States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:55 am by essex county criminal lawyer
While the Court did hold that NIST traceable device does not mean the Ertco-Hart probe alone will suffice, It did remand the unresolved issues to the trial courts to determine the reliability of the Control Probe. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:15 pm
Department of Commerce's United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") will host its first Cybersecurity Partnership Meeting tomorrow, Friday, November 14, 2014, in Menlo Park, California. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
But it’s not just the U.S. government that uses NIST’s cryptographic standards and follows NIST’s guidelines on security. [read post]
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Ubisoft hack hits millions of gamers http://t.co/izlQRJeg1K -> It's time for Google to stop its trollish enforcement of a bogus patent against Apple in Germany http://t.co/RmMhfnL4vc -> Fresenius v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:01 am by Michelle L'Hommedieu
  The state court opinion in Virginia takes a similar approach. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by Unknown
The Order directs the Secretary of Commerce to reconsider proposed regulations concerning technology transfer:    (r)  The Secretary of Commerce shall:          (i)    acting through the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), consider initiating a rulemaking to require agencies to report to NIST, on an annual basis, their contractors’ utilization activities, as reported… [read post]