Search for: "State v. Nist"
Results 21 - 40
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
The Order directs the Secretary of Commerce to reconsider proposed regulations concerning technology transfer: (r) The Secretary of Commerce shall: (i) acting through the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), consider initiating a rulemaking to require agencies to report to NIST, on an annual basis, their contractors’ utilization activities, as reported… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
In 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruling in FTC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"The EO formally just suggests "[re-]considering" the joint policy statement of DOJ, USPTO and NIST on SEPs. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:42 am
I represented the lead defendant in the case that decided the reliability of this machine, State v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:27 am
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
The United States faces persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns that threaten the public sector, the private sector, and ultimately the American people’s security and privacy. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
In FTC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:30 pm
All schools must adopt by July 1, 2020 a data security and privacy policy that implements the requirements of the Regulations and aligns with NIST CSF. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
In light of what a Federal Circuit panel--Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk and Raymond Chen--said at a Tuesday hearing in Thales v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:16 am
While some other sources may put the figure a few percentage points lower, the attractiveness of phishing remains unwavering, whether to nation-state cyber forces, private criminal organizations, or groups that straddle both of those worlds. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:28 am
But compared to last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:46 pm
A contractor that can demonstrate compliance before the end of the year may have an advantage, particularly because the final rule “does not preclude a requiring activity from specifically stating in the solicitation that compliance with the NIST SP 800-171 will be used as an evaluation factor in the source se[le]ction process. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am
Brief of the United States U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:38 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
– The Volokh Conspiracy Are Historical Cell-Site Data Protected Under the Fourth Amendment After United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:22 pm
Unresolved in 2013, the FTC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
At the state level, there have been multiple bills introduced with the aim of regulating AI. [read post]
