Search for: "State v. Norris" Results 1 - 20 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) Supreme Court “Only the gravest effects of interference with family life would make extradition disproportionate to the public interest in the prevention of crime. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:35 am by White Collar Crime Prof Blogger
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) filed an amicus brief in the Ian Norris case - Download Norris v United States (11-91) Brief of NACDL as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner_FINAL It highlights some of the important... [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:21 am by JA Hodnicki
Download Norris v United States (11-91) Brief of NACDL as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner_FINAL It makes two broad points: a. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:21 am by JA Hodnicki
Download Norris v United States (11-91) Brief of NACDL as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner_FINAL It makes two broad points: a. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:48 am by chrislaughton@mercerhole.co.uk
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:Recounted in this remarkable book is a conversation Bill Norris had with Justice White following his opinion for the Supreme Court in Bowers v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Antitrust Today
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has upheld an 18-month prison sentence in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:52 am by Kimberly Amick
Congratulations to Ric Blumhardt of Archer Norris who is now officially an appellate specialist, certified by the California State Bar. [read post]