Search for: "State v. Nunez" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 7:12 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Cross-examination by defense  — Consistency with investigative protocols A jury of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Danilo Enriquez Nunez of second-degree rape and third-degree sexual offense. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:48 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Other than the minor surprise I now experience when any motion to compel arbitration is denied, such agreements having achieved a status as super-contracts with super powers, the decision in Nunez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 4:01 am
Contempt proceeding used to enforce a court order directing reinstatement Angel Nunez v City of New York, 43 AD3d 808 Angel Nunez obtained a court order directing his reinstatement to his former position, or a comparable position, with the New York City Department of Sanitation, together with back pay and benefits [City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 229 AD2d 307, leave to appeal denied, 89 NY2d 801]. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
”Contrary to the content and tone of Nunez’s letter, the probation report states Nunez lied when first contacted by police, was “never cooperative,” and after his arrest and release sent a text message to a codefendant stating, 'Gangster rap made us do it lol.'"Dude. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
Given what the doctrine says -- both the categorical approach as well as the expansive state law doctrine of indecent exposure -- why didn't the government introduce evidence that satisfied the modified approach and proved that Nunez was convicted (as I'm sure he was) of a true moral turpitude offense rather than due to his appearance on "Boys Gone Wild" or on one side of a glory hole?! [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
Which reminded Justice Aaronson of a hypothetical that Justice Mosk authored in the NYU Law Review:"Judge:  I sentence you to 200 years in state prison.  [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:35 pm by Sme
Universal Protection Services (10th Cir., February 16, 2018) (affirming dismissal or Armour's discrimination suit for failure to state a claim: her complaint contained only speculation that Universal's conduct had discriminatory or retaliatory motive)*Nunez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:36 am
Even though I think it is high time we leave Elliot Spitzer alone, William Patry explains that some nude photos can be matter of public concern based on the First Circuit's decision in Nunez v. [read post]