Search for: "State v. Nunez (Decision by Order)" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 4:01 am
Contempt proceeding used to enforce a court order directing reinstatement Angel Nunez v City of New York, 43 AD3d 808 Angel Nunez obtained a court order directing his reinstatement to his former position, or a comparable position, with the New York City Department of Sanitation, together with back pay and benefits [City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 229 AD2d 307, leave to appeal denied, 89 NY2d 801]. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
DECISION: Susan Larabee, Michael Nenno, Patricia Nunez and Geoffrey Wright v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:29 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 Heard: June 26, 2012 Decided: May 14, 2013 Docket No. 11-5113-cv(L), 12-491-cv(XAP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, THE VULCAN SOCIETY, INC., MARCUS HAYWOOD, CANDIDO NUNEZ, ROGER GREGG, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by ALeonard
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit issued an interesting ruling, a 2-1 panel decision, in Nunez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
DECISION: Susan Larabee, Michael Nenno, Patricia Nunez and Geoffrey Wright v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am by Russell Knight
Trice, 32 N.E.3d 553, 557 (Ill. 2015)(citation and quotes omitted) The statute specifically states that all the prerequisites for vacating an order are unnecessary should the order be deemed void. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:36 am
Even though I think it is high time we leave Elliot Spitzer alone, William Patry explains that some nude photos can be matter of public concern based on the First Circuit's decision in Nunez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:20 am by David G. Badertscher
Nunez NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Non-Verbal Gesture Adequately Pleads Unlawful Solicitation, Court Rules People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
Four New Decisions General Electric Co. v. [read post]