Search for: "State v. Oram" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 2:38 am
Apostolides v Orams and Another Court of Justice of the European Communities “The fact that a judgment given in a member state of the European Community concerned land in a part of that state over which the state did not exercise effective control did not mean that the judgment was not subject to recognition and enforcement in [...] [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
Yesterday, on 28 April 2009, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-420/07 (Meletis Apostolides v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 4:40 pm
An audio recording of this morning's oral argument in Morales v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:00 am by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Fleeing persecution: experience of LGBTI asylum seekers in Australia (International Bar Association, April 2021) [text]ORAM and Rainbow Railroad Announce Kakuma Refugee Camp Research Project (ORAM, April 2021) [text]President Biden’s LGBTQI+ Memorandum Protects Refugees & Asylum Seekers: What Else Can Be Done? [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:57 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 79271 (WD MI, June 11, 2014), a Michigan federal district court, although dismissing a number of defendants on immunity grounds, permitted an inmate to proceed against the warden, the chaplain and the state on his complaint that authorities refused to recognize separately and accommodate the practices of the Ismaili branch of the Moorish Science Temple.In Oram v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
”… See also via LLRX – Fenced-off culture, the privatized Internet, and why book publishers lean on a 30-year-old doctrine – Andy Oram, prolific author, editor, publisher, and technical expert on all aspects of computing, undertook an extensive examination of a game changing case, Hachette v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by tracey
Supreme Court Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 32 (9 November 2011) Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257 (09 November 2011) Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH & Ors v Carefusion 303 Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1288 (08 November 2011) SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284 (08… [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 am
The Magistrate Judge found that prison officials were entitled to qualified immunity because before 2005 it would not have been apparent that the prison's policies violated RLUIPA.In Oram v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm by Apostolos Anthimos
The difference lies in the defendants: Unlike the Orams case, the respondent here was a foreign State. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am by Apostolos Anthimos
Hence, the court of the second state may not deny recognition and enforcement on the grounds of perceptions which run contrary to the European perspective. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 10:56 am by Giles Peaker
The necessity of a Tribunal finding on payability before a s.146 could be served was itself enough to bring the legal costs under clause 3.10.1, with reference to Freeholders of 69 Marina, St Leonards-on-Sea v Oram (2011) EWCA Civ 1258, (2012) L. [read post]