Search for: "State v. Owusu"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Mr Justice Coulson placed considerable weight on the decision of the Court of Justice of European Union (“CJEU”) in Owusu v Jackson preventing UK courts from declining jurisdiction on the basis of the forum non conveniens, when the defendant is domiciled in the UK. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm
Because the English Court had jurisdiction over the defendant it has no power to stay proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens (see Owusu v Jackson [2005] 1 QB 801, ECJ). [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
From Chicago to Santiago: The Formation and Impact of the ‘Chicago Boys and Girls’Robert Van Horn, "Corporate Funders, Edward Levi, and the Rise of Chicago Law and Economics in the 1950s"Paul V. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:09 am
He allegedly became agitated during the meeting, banged his hand on the table where they sat, and said that “someone is going to pay for this” (Owusu-Ansah v The Coca-Cola Company, 11th Cir, May 8, 2013). [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:54 am
CRUMPTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 6:08 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in Owusu-Ansah v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Owusu. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm
Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
” – the English abstract reads as follows: Friedrich Carl v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
" State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
On #1, it was held by the Court of Appeal that the result of that decision was not to confer extra-EU jurisdiction, but merely to uphold judicial co-operation between European member states’ courts. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm
MISAT (6) , Owusu v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am
He noted that Skype’s argument that there was no discretion to stay the UK proceedings was founded on Owusu, where the ECJ drew no distinction between Member and non-Member States. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:42 am
 It did not, therefore, refer to the ECJ's observation in para. 28 of its judgment in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) that: [T]he rules of the Brussels Convention on exclusive jurisdiction or express prorogation of jurisdiction are also likely to be applicable to legal relationships involving only one Contracting State and one or more non-Contracting States. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:52 am
The present case concerned a number of applications to stay the English proceedings by Mr Lewinsohn on the grounds of forum non conveniens, with particular emphasis on the fact that there existed corresponding proceedings on the same issues in Utah.In refusing to stay the English proceedings, Mr Justice Barling held that the ECJ's decision in Owusu v Jackson (C-281/02) (2005) QB 801 ECJ applied even in circumstances where there was a prior action underway in a non-EU… [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
Case C-281/02, Owusu v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:50 am
Judgments of Irish Courts The High Court considered the doctrine of forum non conveniens and lis pendens (including the decision in Owusu) and held that, under the Brussels I Regulation, as and between Member States, a strict application of the doctrine of lis pendens applies. [read post]