Search for: "State v. Packingham" Results 41 - 60 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court also says the trial judge exceeded her authority in prohibiting the defendant from accessing adult pornography.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
“The forces and directions of the Internet are so new, so protean, and so far reaching that courts must be conscious that what they say today might be obsolete tomorrow,” Kennedy wrote in Packingham v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:16 am by David Post
The State charged him with felony incest, and he pleaded guilty. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:33 am by Scott Bomboy
Fueling these theories were comments made in a 2017 Supreme Court decision, Packingham v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:19 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The government raises a state action question and the court (with little discussion, and a cite to NY Times v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
The court also rejects the currently-chic argument that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Packingham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:41 am by David Post
[As it happens, this work did bear fruit, ultimately, in last Term's decision in Packingham v. [read post]