Search for: "State v. Pancake" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
(TTABlog) Emphasizing rareness of the surname, TTAB reverses section 2(e)(4) refusal of BOVIS FOODS (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Icon Burger Development Company – Juicy trademark dispute over SMASHBURGER (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) International House of Pancakes – Trademark infringement: Pancakes v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 In this case "when in Rome" demanded that we devour a stack of pancakes. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
International House of Pancakes, 9 Cal. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
Preemption Under The LMRA The Court of Appeals pancaked a former player for the Carolina Panthers in Jeffers v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:48 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit served up some welcome relief for employers in Schaefer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Some are desirable—Aunt Jemima should be allowed to control pancakes, not just pancake syrup to avoid confusion. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm by Robert Laplaca
Manipoun violated the V Club Reward Program Rules which state that only the registered V Club member can gain entries from her own slot machine play, and whereas, Ms. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
 You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]